<?xml version="1.0"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>LadiesAgainstFeminism.com</title>
      <link>http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/</link>
      <description>Ladies Against Feminism</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:12:32 PST</pubDate>
      <language>en-us</language>
      <item>
        <title>LAF&#39;s Not Dead!</title>




<link>http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/LAF_s_Not_Dead1003764.shtml</link>

       
        <category>LAF Theme Articles</category>
        <description>
&lt;img border=&quot;0px&quot; align=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/articles/lafart.gif&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt;It has been a loooong time since the last update, but life has been too full for &quot;spare&quot; time lately -- new baby, new family duties, travel, etc. have meant shelving certain projects. But LAF is only sleeping. BIG changes are in the works, so stay tuned, and thanks for your patience as we&#39;ve been hibernating! Warmly, Mrs. Chancey&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
        <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:10:19 PST</pubDate>


        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/LAF_Theme_Articles_13/LAF_s_Not_Dead1003764.shtml</guid>
</item>
      <item>
        <title>Why men in ads are dumb, goofy or completely inept </title>


<link>http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/why-men-in-ads-are-dumb-goofy-or-completely-inept/article1244197/</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;More and more marketers are trying to tap into the overwhelming buying
power of wives and mothers at the expense of their other halves. Dads
are dumb, boyfriends are bumbling and husbands are utterly hopeless as
brands strive to relate to women by showing men as especially goofy or
incompetent. &lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 11:06:43 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/why-men-in-ads-are-dumb-goofy-or-completely-inept/article1244197/</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>No-Fault Divorce</title>


<link>http://applecidermama.blogspot.com/2009/01/no-fault-divorce.html</link>



       
        <category>Hot Button Issues</category>
        <description>



&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Marriage in the United
States can be both a religious covenant and a legal contract. Different
religions have different views about what constitutes marriage and what
grounds, if any, exist for divorce or anullment. I won&#39;t go into the
nitty-gritty of all these theological and doctrinal matters in this
post. For the time being, I&#39;d like to focus on the legal aspects of
marriage, or more precisely, the legal aspects of dissolving a marriage
contract. Specifically, I would like to address the issue of &quot;no-fault
divorce,&quot; which I believe could rather be rightly termed &quot;divorce on
demand.&quot; A wake-up call about what no-fault divorce is, where it came from, and why we need to oppose it as forcefully as possible.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:12:50 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://applecidermama.blogspot.com/2009/01/no-fault-divorce.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Housewife Superstars</title>


<link>http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=824791</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt; font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;Way back in the Dark Ages, in the 1950s, a woman&#39;s place was in the
home. Like it or lump it, housework was the ultimate satisfying career. If you think those days are long gone, we&#39;ve got some news for you. Some women who have it all, have had enough. &lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 02:02:23 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://sixtyminutes.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=824791</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Families gather around TV to do their own thing</title>


<link>http://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/families_gather_around_tv_to_do_their_own_thing/</link>



       
        <category>Teach Your Children Well</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Electronic media, once a force for togetherness as whole families
gathered around the radio or television, are now pulling families
apart, according to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://technology.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/tech_and_web/personal_tech/article6740741.ece&quot; style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;a report&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt; from the UK&amp;#8217;s communication&amp;#8217;s regulator, Ofcom. [While we&#39;re certainly not Luddites here at LAF, we have long advocated ditching broadcast television, which is a major time-robber and brain drain. But it&#39;s also important to keep a tight rein on other electronic media and remember to keep up face-to-face time with family members. Why not read aloud in the evenings or enjoy a family game night around the table? There are so many meaningful ways to connect besides &quot;tweeting&quot; each other from across the room!]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:51:22 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/families_gather_around_tv_to_do_their_own_thing/</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Oh Yaz, There May be a Problem</title>


<link>http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/12593/lawyer-interview-Laba.html</link>



       
        <category>Hot Button Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Laba is just one of the attorneys preparing to file product liability
(failure to warn) cases against Bayer on behalf of clients who have
come forward with serious injuries they believe are related to the use
of the Yasmin and Yaz birth control pills. &amp;#8220;We are now trying to
determine how many cases there are out there now,&amp;#8221; says Laba. &amp;#8220;These
are women who have either suffered a heart attack or deep vein
thrombosis or a pulmonary embolism or sometimes kidney or renal
problems. They are typically young women between the ages of 17 and 35
or 40.&amp;#8221;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:44:59 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lawyersandsettlements.com/articles/12593/lawyer-interview-Laba.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Clothing and the Humanity of the Superfluous</title>




<link>http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/Femininity_amp_Modesty_16/Clothing_and_the_Humanity_of_the_Superfluous1003738.shtml</link>

       
        <category>Femininity &amp; Modesty</category>
        <description>
&lt;span class=&quot;layout-three-column&quot; style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Ideally, dignity in dress does not
necessarily represent hypocrisy; rather, our apparel grounds us in our
identity and keeps us sane. One can marry the outer&amp;nbsp;and the inner with
integrity.&amp;nbsp;The superfluity of clothing clarifies one&#39;s
identity.&amp;nbsp;Without the superfluous, we are abandoned royalty:&amp;nbsp;wronged,
unprotected, and out in a storm, a&amp;nbsp;storm that is blind to who is human
and who is beast. &lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:41:15 PST</pubDate>


        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/Femininity_amp_Modesty_16/Clothing_and_the_Humanity_of_the_Superfluous1003738.shtml</guid>
</item>
      <item>
        <title>Large Families and the Oldest Child</title>


<link>http://www.generationcedar.com/main/2009/08/large-families-and-the-oldest-child.html</link>



       
        <category>Teach Your Children Well</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;When people see our large family, we get the gamut of comments.&amp;nbsp; Often
though, you can hear concern for the older children&amp;#8211;especially for the
oldest&amp;#8211;as they assume that surely it must be drudgery for her to have
to help take care of them all.&amp;nbsp; And, this might be a natural conclusion
IF you have a jaded view of the blessing of children.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 01:39:19 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.generationcedar.com/main/2009/08/large-families-and-the-oldest-child.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>More Feminist Hypocrisy</title>


<link>http://truefemininity.blogspot.com/2009/07/more-femininist-hypocrisy.html</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Our culture seems to project the idea that only jobs that have a
paycheck are worthwhile, and that as long as you are doing work for
someone &lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;other&lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt; than your loved ones, it is fulfilling.  There are many jobs women do in the workforce that are &lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;exactly the same&lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt; as what they could do for their family, &lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;except &lt;/span&gt;
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;that
the women who work for strangers are seen as &quot;fulfilled,&quot; and the women
who work for loved ones are seen as &quot;enslaved.&quot; Culture says it&#39;s
better to work as a personal assistant or helper to a boss, than as a
helper to your husband. [Be sure to read &lt;a href=&quot;http://truefemininity.blogspot.com/2009/05/hypocrisy-of-feminism.html&quot;&gt;Part One &lt;/a&gt;of this super series!]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;
</description>
        <pubDate>Sat, 08 Aug 2009 00:41:37 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://truefemininity.blogspot.com/2009/07/more-femininist-hypocrisy.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Stressed-out Momma! I Need A Break!</title>


<link>http://jacquedixon.com/?p=3751</link>



       
        <category>Biblical Womanhood and Christian Living</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Though I am still the mother of young children, I do have older
children to help me with them. While having older children doesn&amp;#8217;t
always make it easier, they are a help most of the time&amp;#8230;.but it hasn&amp;#8217;t ALWAYS been that way! There was a time when I had 3
children 4 and under. Amanda had just turned 4, two weeks before Rachel
was born. It can be tough. It wasn&amp;#8217;t much easier having 5 children 10,
8, 6, 2, and a newborn.&lt;/span&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt; Easier. &lt;/span&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Funny that that is the focus, isn&amp;#8217;t it? Is
it supposed to be easy having the toughest and most important job in
the world? No, I don&amp;#8217;t think so, but knowing the Creator of all these
little munchkins sure gives us some answers as to how.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:30:56 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://jacquedixon.com/?p=3751</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Top Five Reasons Not to Send Your Kids Back to Govt. School</title>


<link>http://www.voddiebaucham.org/vbm/Blog/Entries/2009/6/25_Top_Five_REasons_Not_to_Send_Your_Kids_Back_to_Govt._School.html</link>



       
        <category>Teach Your Children Well</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Anyone who has kept up with my blog knows that I am no fan of government education.&amp;nbsp; I have made it a point to carry &lt;/span&gt;
	&lt;span class=&quot;style&quot; style=&quot;font-style: italic; font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;The Continuing Collapse&lt;/span&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
on a regular basis, and I try to make biblical, philosophical and
theological arguments in favor of Christian education as often as
possible. However, I recognize the obstacles those of us on my side of
the street face.&amp;nbsp; As many as eighty-five to ninety percent of
professing Christians send their children to the government for their
education. That is simply an astonishing figure considering the fact
that the Christian community fought mandatory government education
tooth-and-nail for it&amp;#8217;s first fifty years of existence. Since then we
have gone from fighting against government schools to &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ethicsdaily.com/news.php?viewStory=14356&quot; onclick=&quot;window.open(this.href); return false;&quot; onkeypress=&quot;window.open(this.href); return false;&quot; title=&quot;http://www.ethicsdaily.com/news.php?viewStory=14356&quot; style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;fighting for them and implying that those who fight against them are fundamentalists, anti-intellectuals, and racists&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;.&amp;nbsp;In the meantime, our schools grow progressively worse.&amp;nbsp; Well, as we
begin this summer, I want to appeal to those of you with children in
government schools. Please don&amp;#8217;t send them back!&amp;nbsp; I beg you to
consider what you are doing.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:26:37 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.voddiebaucham.org/vbm/Blog/Entries/2009/6/25_Top_Five_REasons_Not_to_Send_Your_Kids_Back_to_Govt._School.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Leading and Submitting</title>


<link>http://www.boundless.org/2005/articles/a0002084.cfm</link>



       
        <category>Responsible Manhood</category>
        <description>

&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;The biblical beauty of mature masculinity can be contrasted with two distortions that arise, namely 
		&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;machismo&lt;/span&gt; and 
		&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;passivity&lt;/span&gt;.
Passivity is by far the more significant problem in Western culture
today, so I&#39;ll tackle this one first. It is also more difficult to
detect; we are immune to it since it is so pervasive.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:23:08 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.boundless.org/2005/articles/a0002084.cfm</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>What&amp;#8217;s wrong with early marriage anyway?</title>


<link>http://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/whats_wrong_with_early_marriage_anyway/</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Sociologist Mark Regnerus politely prods one of the sacred cows of
population experts, most of whom fall into the zero population growth
camp. Regnerus doesn&amp;#8217;t go into the anti-natalist roots of the campaign
against early marriage, although they certainly bear investigation;
rather, he argues on biological, emotional and economic grounds for the
benefits of early marriage.
&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:19:38 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.mercatornet.com/family_edge/view/whats_wrong_with_early_marriage_anyway/</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>In praise of patriarchs</title>


<link>http://www.canada.com/Life/praise+patriarchs/1718161/story.html</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>

&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;We have a society in North America that is, thanks to the triumph of
feminism, progressively shedding the masculine qualities that any
society needs to survive. Women themselves are progressively &quot;freed&quot;
from masculine protection at many levels; men, raised to be wimps,
progressively abandon all sense of duty. Outwardly, the &quot;superior sex&quot; obtains a
tyrannical power, but inwardly, their souls are stripped of the
moderation, and imaginative empathy, that can come only from respectful
interaction between the sexes.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:15:18 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.canada.com/Life/praise+patriarchs/1718161/story.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Feminists Deny Truth on Domestic Violence</title>


<link>http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197550,00.html</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;In the last three decades, feminism has revolutionized daily life from the legal system and social mores down to the story books children use in kindergarten. Feminist discussion seems to be &#39;always&#39; and &#39;everywhere&#39;. But I believe the contrary is true. Genuine discussion of feminist issues ended in the 1970s when one school came to dominate and moved to silence competing views both within the movement and outside. [
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-weight: bold;&quot;&gt;Not for young readers.&lt;/span&gt;]&lt;br /&gt;
	&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:10:45 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,197550,00.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Persistent Myths in Feminist Scholarship</title>


<link>http://www.aei.org/article/100695</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;All books have mistakes, so why pick on the feminists? My complaint
with feminist research is not so much that the authors make mistakes;
it is that the mistakes are impervious to reasoned criticism. They do
not get corrected. The authors are passionately committed to the
proposition that American women are oppressed and under siege. The
scholars seize and hold on for dear life to any piece of data that
appears to corroborate their dire worldview. At the same time, any
critic who attempts to correct the false assumptions is dismissed as a
backlasher and an anti-feminist crank.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:02:29 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.aei.org/article/100695</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Disney world &amp;#8216;too heterosexual&amp;#8217; for children&amp;#8217;s good</title>




<link>http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/Feminism_and_Related_Issues_5/Disney_world_too_heterosexual_for_children_s_good1003727.shtml</link>

       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Many experts are concerned about the effects on children of their being
immersed in electronic media from a tender age. They worry largely
about the things they are not doing while watching TV or videos:
developing their vocabulary through talking to their parents; listening
to or reading books; going to the park for healthy exercise and social
activities. But two sociologists have come up with a novel reason for
fretting about kids&amp;#8217; exposure to media: the risk of seeing
heterosexuality as normal and desirable.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 06:00:12 PST</pubDate>


        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.ladiesagainstfeminism.com/artman/publish/Feminism_and_Related_Issues_5/Disney_world_too_heterosexual_for_children_s_good1003727.shtml</guid>
</item>
      <item>
        <title>Feminism has become just another special interest</title>


<link>http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/media-and-culture/feminism-has-become-just-another-special-interest-200907173862/</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Economists are already &lt;/span&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/016/659dkrod.asp&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman;&quot;&gt;speaking&lt;/a&gt;
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;
of a &amp;#8220;man-cession&amp;#8221; with deep implications to the social fabric of
society. It was not only market forces which brought this about.
Organized feminist lobbyism played a major role here, manipulating
president Obama&amp;#8217;s stimulus plan, the $787 billion American Recovery and
Reinvestment Act of 2009. Originally his emulation of the 1930&amp;#8217;s New
Deal aimed to protect jobs in exactly those hardest-hit sectors by
investing in &amp;#8220;shovel ready&amp;#8221; programs to modernize roads, bridges,
electric grids and other infrastructure. [Note: We are absolutely not in favor of any government &quot;stimulus&quot; program -- i.e. robbing Peter to pay Mary -- but this article nevertheless demonstrates that feminists lobby for unequal treatment of men, even when it is obvious that men are the ones being hurt the most by the weak economy.]&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:57:12 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.adamsmith.org/blog/media-and-culture/feminism-has-become-just-another-special-interest-200907173862/</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>The Feminist Way of Interviewing</title>


<link>http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/the_feminist_way_of_interviewi.html</link>



       
        <category>Feminism and Related Issues</category>
        <description>

&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: times new roman,times; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;The first rule of feminism
is that males and females are identical in all respects except when it
advantages females to be treated differently. As Christina Hoff
Sommers, author&amp;nbsp; of 
	
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Who Stole Feminism?&lt;/span&gt;, a searing critique of &quot;gender feminism,&quot; says, the idea is that &quot;men and women are the same, only women are better.&quot; &lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:54:43 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/07/the_feminist_way_of_interviewi.html</guid>


</item>
      <item>
        <title>Too Many (Other) People</title>


<link>http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w102.html</link>



       
        <category>Hot Button Issues</category>
        <description>
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;As a left-leaning 
              Rutgers law professor in the early 1970s, Ruth Bader Ginsburg thought 
              that the 
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;Roe v. Wade&lt;/span&gt; abortion decision was the product of 
              &quot;concern about population growth and particularly growth in 
              populations we don&amp;#8217;t want too many of,&quot; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/12/magazine/12ginsburg-t.html?ref=magazine&quot;&gt;she 
              recalled in a recent 
		&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;New York Times&lt;/span&gt; Magazine interview&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/span&gt;
&lt;span style=&quot;font-family: Times New Roman,Times,serif; font-size: 12pt;&quot;&gt;Ginsburg doesn&amp;#8217;t 
              specify which parts of the human population &quot;we&quot; should 
              cull, or how the creation of an abortion &quot;right&quot; would 
              necessarily be a prelude to creation of a system in which abortion 
              would be 
	&lt;span style=&quot;font-style: italic;&quot;&gt;required &lt;/span&gt;in some circumstances.&lt;/span&gt;</description>
        <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 05:51:38 PST</pubDate>
        <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.lewrockwell.com/grigg/grigg-w102.html</guid>


</item>


  </channel>
</rss>
