Posted By LAF Editor on February 25, 2014
[M]any people voiced opposition to the euthanasia bill, stating that children should never be asked whether or not they want to intentionally end their lives.
“The law says adolescents cannot make important decisions on economic or emotional issues, but suddenly they’ve become able to decide that someone should make them die,” observed Andre-Joseph Leonard, an archbishop in Belgium.
American businessman and former presidential candidate Steve Forbes likewise expressed concern about the Belgian measure, opining that it exemplifies the “slippery slope” of euthanasia.
“We are on the malignantly slippery slope to becoming a society like that envisioned by Nazi Germany, one in which ‘undesirables’ are disposed of like used tissue,” Forbes wrote in a recent column. “The Holocaust and other Nazi atrocities sidetracked the eugenics movement. But now it’s making a comeback in new garb—we want to kill only to reduce suffering.”
“As euthanasia becomes more accepted—and we become more numb to the horror of murdering people like this—we’ll descend to the next abomination: pressuring the sick to discontinue treatment for a likely fatal illness in the name of ‘saving scarce resources’ for people who have more years ahead of them,” he suggested.
“The true mark of a civilization is in how it treats its most vulnerable members,” Forbes concluded.
Read the rest here
Why the Church Needs Bioethics: A Guide to Wise Engagement with Life’s Challenges
Suffer the Children: The Blessing of ‘Imperfect’ Children
Grandma’s Moving In! (Learning to Care Series)
Ethical Issues by Greg Bahnsen